<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plain Language &#8211; Spark Content</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sparkcontent.ca/category/plain-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sparkcontent.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Thinking inside the box (when it’s a really tiny box)</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2017/10/02/thinking-inside-box-really-tiny-box/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During our years creating smartphone documentation, we got very familiar with “the box” – not only the rhetorical box that we needed to think outside of to keep innovating, but also the physical box that we needed to think of .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During our years creating smartphone documentation, we got very familiar with “the box” – not only the rhetorical box that we needed to think outside of to keep innovating, but also the physical box that we needed to think of when planning for a new release.</p>
<p>As smartphones got smaller, the boxes got smaller too. As they became more ingrained into our daily routines, they also came with more accessories to help us out. All of this left less and less room for user documentation. Often, we had to think outside of the box to figure out how to fit everything inside the box.</p>
<p>The most obvious way to reduce the size of printed documentation is to reduce the amount of information in it. For both environmental and space reasons, we moved much of the smartphone documentation online. But, there were some things that we couldn’t move, such as information on where the power button was, or what gestures users needed to know to navigate the user interface and set up the phone – not to mention how to find all the information that we had removed from the printed documentation!</p>
<p>But, what do you do if you’ve removed all the information that you think you can and you’re still struggling to fit your documentation into a physical package? Here are a few other ways to shrink your printed documentation without impacting its usability:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Use thinner paper.</strong> When box space is measured to tenths of a millimetre, shrinking the thickness of each page can make a difference when you add up the pages. Keep in mind that the paper still needs to be thick enough so there’s no ink bleed from one side of the paper to the other. The documentation isn’t helpful if users can’t read it.</li>
<li><strong>Reduce the font size.</strong> There is a limit to how low you can go – in limbo and in font size. But, font size is often something that you can play with. Keep your audience in mind, as products aimed at younger audiences can generally squeak by with smaller fonts than those aimed at an aging population. If you’re translating the documentation, you might not be able to reduce the font size for some languages without impacting the readability of the characters.</li>
<li><strong>Use narrower margins.</strong> If you have short paragraphs or steps, you might be able to get away with slightly smaller side margins. But, there is a limit to how tightly you can pack in the text. People need white space around the text – both between the lines and at the sides – to comfortably read it. With short paragraphs, however, the internal white space might balance out the decreased space in the margins.</li>
<li><strong>Replace text with graphics.</strong> Unlike the old adage says, you can’t often replace 1000 words with just one picture. But, you can condense short bits of information into one graphic to save space. In most cases, callouts or tables are easier for users to scan and find the information they need, rather than long paragraphs of text.</li>
<li><strong>Look at the whole package. </strong>This is where you start to think outside of the box – and the documentation. Can some information go somewhere else? For example, is there empty space on the packaging where you can put support information? Is information duplicated? If it’s on the packaging and in the documentation, can you remove it from one? Can you replace paper with another format? In our case, the smartphones shipped with blank clings on the screen and the back of the device. By moving some information out of the documentation and onto those clings, we could make better use of the space. And, better yet, the information was more visible to users.</li>
<li><strong>Take another look at the information.</strong> It never hurts to take a second (or third) pass at your content to make sure that it really is as streamlined as it can be. A good editor can help you with that task. It’s easy to get into the habit of carrying forward information because it’s always been there, without considering whether it is still necessary. A fresh set of eyes can help assess the need for content. For example, new features or emerging technology might necessitate a more detailed explanation at first. But, as it becomes mainstream, you can likely reduce that additional contextual information. Or you might be able to remove it entirely.</li>
<li><strong>The Three Cs: </strong>When you know what content needs to be included, it’s time to take a review how the content is written. Clarity, consistency, and conciseness are rules that every technical writer needs to live by. When you are working with tight spaces, they are even more important. Are there ways to tighten up the text? Have you applied plain language principles? Can you use fewer words to express the same thought?</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see, there are many ways to reduce the size of your documentation without reducing its usability. You might even find that making a few changes to reduce space improves the overall readability of your documentation.</p>
<p>If you need help fitting information into a printed format, or figuring out what to keep in the box and what to do with the rest, give Spark a call. We can help you find a solution to your space problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why it’s important to write like a reader</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2017/06/05/important-write-like-reader/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As writers, we’re flexible when it comes to how we get the information that we need for a project. We’re just as comfortable talking to someone, going through the software ourselves to pull out information, or reading through reference documentation .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As writers, we’re flexible when it comes to how we get the information that we need for a project. We’re just as comfortable talking to someone, going through the software ourselves to pull out information, or reading through reference documentation and turning it into user-facing documentation – usually we do a bit of all three! While it’s great to have developer requirements or marketing materials as a starting point, we can’t just edit them and call it a day. As handy as they can be, they often fall short of what we – and users – really need.</p>
<h3>It’s all about perspective</h3>
<p>The best documentation addresses what users are trying to learn, not what the writer is trying to tell them to learn. Many developer and marketing documents tend to focus on what the writer wants the reader to know. We can’t fault them: people tend to write about what they know. Developers know how they’ve coded the user interface, so development documents tend to outline the UI elements and their options. Marketing teams want their product to sound better than the competitor, so their documents list flashy features and impressive statistics. But, both often miss out on why the user interacts with the documentation. Users don’t want to know what settings are on a screen. They want to know why they need to use those settings. And that list of flashy features loses its shine if users don’t know why those features are so great. When thinking about user documentation, it’s important to understand the user’s goal in reading the documentation.</p>
<h3>The key is thinking about <em>why</em>, not just <em>what</em> or <em>how</em></h3>
<p>To get to the user’s goal, we ask questions. The first two are “What does this do?” and “How do you use it?” While it might seem like that’s all the information that you need, it’s missing one important piece. The <em>what</em> and <em>how</em> don’t help users without also asking the <em>why</em>.</p>
<p>If I told you how to change your phone settings so that applications closed after a set period of inactivity, what would be your incentive to use this feature? It might take you longer to open the app the next time you wanted to use it. That doesn’t sound like a useful feature and you have no reason to use it. But, what if I told you that closing your apps made your phone battery to last longer? There’s your incentive. There’s the <em>why</em>.</p>
<p>By asking questions, we find the <em>why</em> that users are looking for. We also sometimes uncover awkward workflows that come from forgetting the <em>why</em>. For example, you might have two teams who are working on two separate, but related, features, each with its own settings screen. If you focus only on the <em>how</em> of changing the settings for each feature, it might not be obvious if users must make changes on one screen before making changes the other. If the task done frequently, switching back and forth between the screens isn’t the best solution. Asking <em>why</em> a user is changing the settings reveals that it is more effective to have the settings on one screen, regardless of which team coded the features.</p>
<h3>Writing is about anticipating what users want to know</h3>
<p>It’s easier to write about what a product or feature does. But, it’s more effective to write about why someone would use the documentation for that product or feature. By focusing on why, you are more likely to meet their needs. And, if you can’t meet their needs, they’ll go somewhere else that can.</p>
<p>If you aren’t sure if your documentation is giving users what they need, the writers at Spark can help you find the right focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three free tools to check your writing quickly</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2016/04/22/three-free-tools-quickly-check-writing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We’ve all been there. You need to send something internally, and you’re in a hurry. You take pride in your professionalism and want to make sure that your message is polished and clear; you’re worried that you might overlook something .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve all been there. You need to send something internally, and you’re in a hurry. You take pride in your professionalism and want to make sure that your message is polished and clear; you’re worried that you might overlook something in your rush.</p>
<p>Have no fear! There are several free tools that you can use to make sure that small mistakes don’t drag down your writing when you’re crunched for time.</p>
<p>For this post, I considered some common consequences of quick writing – spelling and grammar mistakes, passive voice, and poor readability – and looked at the pros and cons of Microsoft Word, Grammarly, and Hemingway Editor.</p>
<p>A few caveats: I haven’t tried the paid versions of Grammarly or Hemingway Editor since this is about free tools, so all comments refer to the free versions. Word isn’t technically free, but since most companies already have a license for Word, there’s no additional cost to use it.</p>
<h3>Microsoft Word</h3>
<p>You’re probably already familiar with Word. It checks spelling as you type, or you can run the spelling and grammar checker as a separate tool. It autocorrects common typos, such as teh or adn, and you can add your own typos to the autocorrect list.</p>
<p>What many don’t know is that Word also has a feature that uses standard readability calculations to check how readable your text is. By looking at the length and number of words and sentences, Word can give you an idea of how easy your text is to read.</p>
<p>To turn on readability statistics, go to <strong>File</strong> &gt; <strong>Options</strong> &gt; <strong>Proofing</strong>. In the <strong>When correcting spelling and grammar in Word</strong> section, select the <strong>Show readability statistics</strong> check box.</p>
<p>To check your text, on the <strong>Review</strong> tab, click <strong>Spelling &amp; Grammar</strong>. After the spelling and grammar checker runs, Word shows the readability summary.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-367 size-medium" src="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/readability-300x278.png" alt="Word readability statistics" width="300" height="278" align="right" hspace="15" srcset="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/readability-300x278.png 300w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/readability.png 314w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p>In the <strong>Averages</strong> section, look at the <strong>Words per Sentence</strong> metric. Shorter sentences are easier to read and understand, so try to keep the number lower. An average of about 15 words or less is a reasonable length.</p>
<p>In the <strong>Readability</strong> section, look at the <strong>Flesch Reading Ease</strong> and <strong>Flesch-Kincaid Grade level</strong>. These show how complex your words and sentences are. A higher reading ease number and lower grade level indicate that more people will be able to understand your message. I usually aim for a reading ease above 50 and a grade level of 9 or lower.</p>
<p>Older versions of Word showed the number of sentences that used passive voice; newer versions don’t. If your version of Word shows it, aim for zero. Passive voice can obscure the meaning of a sentence, so it’s better if you can use active voice.</p>
<p><strong>Tip:</strong> If you are having a hard time getting the Flesch Reading Ease number up or the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level down, select and run the spelling and grammar tool on a few paragraphs at a time to figure out which paragraphs need special attention.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Pros</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>You can add words to your personal dictionary so Word doesn’t flag them as errors.</li>
<li>You can set up autocorrect for common typos.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Cons</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>It doesn’t give any guidance on how to fix readability issues; if you don’t know what you’re looking for, you might need another tool anyway.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Grammarly</h3>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-365 size-medium" src="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/grammarly-300x158.jpg" alt="Grammary example" width="300" height="158" align="right" hspace="15" srcset="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/grammarly-300x158.jpg 300w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/grammarly-768x405.jpg 768w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/grammarly-1024x539.jpg 1024w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/grammarly.jpg 1046w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />To use Grammarly, create a free account at <a href="http://www.grammarly.com">www.grammarly.com</a>. After you create your account, you can use the online editor or download the desktop application. You can integrate Grammarly into Microsoft Office and your Outlook email client. If you use Chrome, you can also add the Grammarly extension.</p>
<p>Although the premium version offers more features, Grammarly’s free version is still surprisingly robust. It looks for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors and offers suggested changes. It also looks at sentence structure and common style errors.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Pros</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>You can add words to your personal dictionary so Grammarly doesn’t flag them as errors.</li>
<li>In the Chrome extension, you can turn off checking on specified websites. For example, if you have a wiki site, you can turn off Grammarly for that site so that it isn’t constantly flagging markup.</li>
<li>You can import or drag and drop Word documents into Grammarly.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Cons</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Grammarly doesn’t warn you about long sentences or complex words.</li>
<li>Grammarly considers passive voice an advanced error. The online and desktop applications tell you the number and type of advanced errors found. Want to know what and where those advanced errors are? It’ll cost you.</li>
<li>Occasionally, Grammarly slowed down another app while it was checking text.</li>
<li>On at least one occasion, the Chrome extension caused issues with features on a website. In my case, it caused an upload error. The error didn’t specifically call out Grammarly, just that there was an issue with the upload. But, after several failed attempts, I disabled Grammarly for that particular site and the error went away.</li>
<li>If you enable Grammarly for Microsoft Office products, it disables the auto-save and undo features of Word. For me, this was enough to disable the Grammarly extension for Microsoft completely. Unfortunately, you can’t disable Grammarly for Word and still keep it for Outlook. On the up side, you can turn it on and off easily. So you could keep it off by default, and turn it on just to check your text.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Hemingway Editor</h3>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignright wp-image-366 size-medium" src="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/hemingway-300x132.png" alt="Hemingway Editor example" width="300" height="132" align="right" hspace="15" srcset="https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/hemingway-300x132.png 300w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/hemingway-768x339.png 768w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/hemingway-1024x452.png 1024w, https://sparkcontent.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/hemingway.png 1230w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />You can use the Hemingway Editor online for free at <a href="http://www.hemingwayapp.com/">www.hemingwayapp.com</a> or download a paid desktop version.</p>
<p>To use the online version, paste or type your text into their editor. It marks up the text as you go, flagging spelling errors, sentences that use passive voice or adverbs, and long sentences.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Pros</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>It shows the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and gives you an approximation of how readable your text is.</li>
<li>It highlights passive voice.</li>
<li>It offers suggestions for phrases that have simpler alternatives.</li>
<li>If you click More, it shows you the approximate time to read the text.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
<h4>Cons</h4>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>The highlighting can be distracting if you are working with a longer document.</li>
<li>There’s no way to limit checking to only one part of the text unless you paste smaller chunks into the editor.</li>
<li>If you paste a long document into the editor, the text sometimes overlaps and you can’t read it.</li>
<li>It marks sentences as “hard to read” if they are longer than 15 words. Although we recommend an average of 15 words per sentence, it isn’t wrong to have a few sentences that are longer.</li>
<li>It looks only at sentence length, not at complex words. For example, it has no issues with “This sentence includes copious instances of superfluous verbiage.”</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Which is the best?</h3>
<p>None of these tools are foolproof. Word’s readability statistics are useful as an overview, but they don’t help your fix errors. Hemingway Editor flags sentences that use passive voice and complex phrases, but it can be finicky to use. Grammarly’s integrated features are handy, but I still ignore some of its “errors.”</p>
<p>This list of tools isn’t exhaustive – they are just three of the more common ones that I’ve tried. So, if none of these work for you, poke around and try something else. Use whatever you feel comfortable using!</p>
<p>If you can’t find something that works for you, or you have documents that need more in-depth review, the keen-eyed human writers at Spark are always here to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letting off a little STEAM about STEM</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2015/11/06/letting-off-a-little-steam-about-stem/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everyone is talking about STEM. The acronym (which stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) might be little, but the focus on these areas is huge. And it’s been building for some time. In 2010, the Canadian Government launched the .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is talking about <a href="http://www.ed.gov/stem" target="_blank" rel="noopener">STEM</a>. The acronym (which stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) might be little, but the focus on these areas is huge. And it’s been building for some time. In 2010, the Canadian Government launched the <a href="http://www.feddevontario.gc.ca/eic/site/723.nsf/eng/00417.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Youth STEM program</a>, to encourage education and careers in STEM. That same year, the U.S. government spearheaded a <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-expands-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-eng" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$250 million investment</a> to increase funding for education and training in areas related to STEM. More recently, both <a href="http://www.scouts.ca/stem/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Scouts Canada</a> and <a href="http://www.engineering.com/Education/EducationArticles/ArticleID/7057/Girl-Guides-to-Promote-STEM-Education.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Girl Guides of Canada</a> developed their own STEM programs.</p>
<p>There’s also a concentrated push to get more women interested in STEM. This September, the University of Waterloo announced <a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/news/news/university-waterloo-awards-heforshe-scholarships-outstanding" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new scholarships to help women in STEM programs</a>. The same day, they announced a <a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/news/news/waterloo-boosts-efforts-recruit-women-computing-new" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Director of Women in Computer Science</a> position, designed to help women entering the program and to expand on the university’s existing Women in Computer Science, Women in Engineering, and Women in Science committees.</p>
<p>STEM is everywhere.</p>
<p>Now, there’s another movement that is slowing building momentum: STEAM, where the “A” highlights the important role that Arts graduates play in STEM-related fields. In July 2015, Forbes published an essay outlining how <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeanders/2015/07/29/liberal-arts-degree-tech/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">some of the most successful tech companies are recognizing the value of &#8220;useless&#8221; Arts degrees</a>. In March 2015, the Washington Post published an opinion piece <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-stem-wont-make-us-successful/2015/03/26/5f4604f2-d2a5-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arguing that it was <em>because</em> of the advances in technology that society still needs Arts graduates</a>*. The key point of these articles: innovation requires more than a knowledge of things; it requires an understanding of people’s wants and needs so that you can give it to them. An Arts education provides that human touch. Or, as <a href="http://www.wired.com/2011/08/apple-liberal-arts/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Steve Jobs put it</a>, “technology alone is not enough … it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.”</p>
<p>Even the University of Waterloo, while announcing their support for women in STEM, recognizes the need for balance. They teamed up with Wilfred Laurier University and The Working Centre to <a href="http://www.thecord.ca/bas-in-tech/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">create a program</a> to highlight the important critical thinking and interpersonal skills that Arts and Humanities graduates can bring to companies within the local technology sector.</p>
<p>As content writers for high-tech companies, we’re happy to see people recognizing the benefits of blending arts and technology; we’ve seen those benefits first-hand. Graduates from STEM-related fields approach things very methodically. They have to. But, your average users aren’t engineers or computer whizzes. They don’t want the detailed explanation; they just want the answer. Preferably in <a href="https://sparkcontent.ca/2015/10/13/just-plain-awesome-can-content-be-complete-without-being-complicated/">plain language</a>. Arts graduates play an important role in closing the divide between the detailed explanations that engineers provide, and the straightforward answers that users want.</p>
<p>That divide hits close to home for me. As a woman with one foot on each side of the line between STEM and the Arts, I’ve always felt a bit torn. I’m very proud of my BMath degree. I’m also proud that I use it to write. But, there are still people who see Arts degrees as “useless,” or at least subpar compared to other degrees. Putting more focus on creating STEM graduates can sometimes overshadow the impact of Arts professions and pit one against the other. The Mathie in me applauds efforts that highlight the importance of STEM, while the writer in me defends the resulting implication that Arts are not as important. It’s great to see articles shining a light on the positive contributions that Arts grads make in technology.</p>
<p>There’s plenty of room – and a need – for both STEM and Arts. The technology-savvy writers at Spark Content can show you how well the two complement each other.</p>
<p>* One minor nitpick with the Washington Post article. I would argue with this statement: “There is no way to write a six-page, narratively structured memo and not have clear thinking.” I suspect that plain language could help improve the clarity of their thinking in less than six pages. But, that’s better left for another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Plain Awesome: can content be complete without being complicated?</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2015/10/13/just-plain-awesome-can-content-be-complete-without-being-complicated/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ever read the policy documents for your car insurance? How about the Terms and Conditions when you install new software? Financial statements? Even though we should read them, we probably don’t. We clip the car insurance slips and put them .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever read the policy documents for your car insurance? How about the Terms and Conditions when you install new software? Financial statements? Even though we should read them, we probably don’t. We clip the car insurance slips and put them in the car, click “I agree” on the Terms and Conditions page, and file the paperwork. What is it about this type of content that makes us our eyes glaze over?</p>
<p>The content gets a bad rap – it has a reputation for being dense and confusing, with its complicated and detailed language. That language seems necessary – insurance paperwork, for example, should be specific about what is covered. But, believe it or not, even this content can be complete without being complicated.</p>
<p>Today is International Plain Language Day. For almost 30 years, the plain language movement has championed clear communication using clear language. The goal is to get your message across the first time that it is read. It doesn’t mean that you need to “dumb down” your content, but that you tailor your content to suit your audience.</p>
<p>Plain language has some obvious benefits. If users understand your content the first time that they read it, it saves them time, reduces their frustration, and builds their trust. You can avoid misunderstandings, errors, and, even costly customer support calls.</p>
<p>Where do you begin? Here are six strategies that you can use to apply plain language to your content:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Understand your audience:</strong> Ask some basic questions to understand who your audience is and what they know.</li>
<li><strong>Organize your content:</strong> Focus on what’s important to the audience and omit what isn’t necessary.</li>
<li><strong>Develop your content:</strong> Keep paragraphs to a single idea and use short sentences where you can.</li>
<li><strong>Consider your tone:</strong> Be aware of the implied tone in your writing. Make sure it’s what you want.</li>
<li><strong>Consistency, clarity, and conciseness:</strong> Revise your content. Look for inconsistent wording, eliminate unnecessary words, and use words familiar to your audience.</li>
<li><strong>Use the active voice:</strong> Brush up on the difference between passive and active voice. Use the active voice when you can.</li>
</ul>
<p>Converting your content to plain language can take planning, when you consider how much content you have. Everything from website content to social media posts to product collateral can benefit from plain language. You can phase it in over time, but you risk giving users a disjointed message. Or, you can try to time it with a particular event – a product launch or refresh, for example. That approach is better for the user, but puts a lot of pressure on writing resources.</p>
<p>At Spark, we’re passionate about plain language and can bring out the best in your content. With our knowledge and experience, we can take complicated consumer communications and apply these plain language principles. The end result is clear, complete content that readers can understand – without the extra complications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three reasons to hire three word nerds</title>
		<link>https://sparkcontent.ca/2015/09/21/three-reasons-to-hire-three-word-nerds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMoProAVD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkcontent.ca/?p=305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you need something written for your business, using one of your engineers, developers, or marketing team members might seem like the obvious choice. They already know the ins and outs of your business and product. You already pay them .....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you need something written for your business, using one of your engineers, developers, or marketing team members might seem like the obvious choice. They already know the ins and outs of your business and product. You already pay them to work for you. It seems like an open and shut case, doesn&#8217;t it? But, knowing your business doesn’t always translate into being able to deliver your message effectively. Here are a few ways that hiring the word nerds at Spark Content can benefit you and your customers.</p>
<h4>We clarify and clean up</h4>
<p>We’re writers. It’s our thing, and we’re pretty good at it (if we do say so ourselves.) Writing isn’t just putting words to paper. It’s finding the right words to use and creating a flow that’s easy to follow. People less familiar with writing principles tend to put as much information as they can into a document to try to help users. But what seems helpful to add can ultimately hold users back.</p>
<p>We’re skilled at taking technical content and making it easier to read. Have a manual that feels more like a medical textbook? We can streamline it to a more manageable size. We cut through the jargon and unintentional fluff to focus on the task at hand. Your users get the answers that they need as quickly as possible.</p>
<h4>We look at the whole picture</h4>
<p>We call ourselves content developers for a reason. We don’t look just at the specific changes that need to be made. We consider how those changes affect your company’s broader content set. For example, can changes help offset your customer support needs? How do they align with your marketing materials? If your employees focus on one area of your business, they might not realize that making changes can impact other areas. We can make sure that the impact is positive.</p>
<p>We also think about translation, legal requirements, and print needs. So, when those questions come up, we already have answers for you.</p>
<h4>We bring an outside perspective</h4>
<p>An outside perspective means that we step back and look at the content with fresh eyes. For example, the feature that took the longest to design or code might be the most important to your project team, but it isn&#8217;t always the most important to your users. Your employees might not even realize that they are attached to certain features after their trials and tribulations with them throughout a project. We have the experience to look at all of the content objectively and align it to what your users need.</p>
<p>Our unique perspective also means that we&#8217;re away from the technical details – just like your customers. We ask questions about what we don&#8217;t understand, which are probably the same things that your users don’t understand. We have a good perspective on the kind of information and level of detail that a user is looking for.</p>
<p>We also bring with us our years of experience on other content. You benefit from the times we reworked content to fit a smaller box size or developed online help for mobile applications. Our content experience can work for you.</p>
<h4>We make your business our business</h4>
<p>The obvious decision of using an engineer, developer, or marketing team member to write content isn’t so obvious when you look at what a contractor can bring. Your employee might know your business already, but we make it our goal to learn your business quickly. We know how to write about products, how to get to the heart of your message, how to make sure that the message compliments and aligns with your existing content, and how to make sure that it delivers what your customers need.</p>
<p>Make Spark Content your content development team. With our expertise, we look at the whole picture to polish your content. At Spark, we’ve got content covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
